{"id":598,"date":"2022-07-06T18:56:00","date_gmt":"2022-07-07T01:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/njnylawyers.wpengine.com\/?p=598"},"modified":"2023-03-06T15:36:41","modified_gmt":"2023-03-06T22:36:41","slug":"jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/es\/blog\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\/","title":{"rendered":"Un jurado considera negligencia m\u00e9dica a un paciente que se someti\u00f3 a una vasectom\u00eda"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nadie acude a un centro m\u00e9dico de Nueva Jersey esperando que le practiquen una intervenci\u00f3n y al final le practiquen otra. Eso mismo le ocurri\u00f3 a un hombre que iba a someterse a una circuncisi\u00f3n, pero en su lugar recibi\u00f3 una vasectom\u00eda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">\u00bfQu\u00e9 ha ocurrido?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Un hombre de unos 40 a\u00f1os ten\u00eda programada una circuncisi\u00f3n en una cl\u00ednica de Iowa. Aunque es padre de tres hijos, ten\u00eda planes de tener m\u00e1s. Esto no fue posible porque, en lugar del procedimiento que esperaba, se dio cuenta m\u00e1s tarde de que el m\u00e9dico le hab\u00eda practicado la circuncisi\u00f3n.&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.webmd.com\/men\/news\/20211216\/vasectomy-instead-of-circumcision\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">realiz\u00f3 una vasectom\u00eda<\/a>. La noticia fue devastadora para \u00e9l.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">El jurado concede al hombre una indemnizaci\u00f3n por negligencia m\u00e9dica<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La situaci\u00f3n llev\u00f3 al hombre a presentar una demanda por negligencia m\u00e9dica. El m\u00e9dico y el personal de la cl\u00ednica donde se realiz\u00f3 la intervenci\u00f3n parec\u00edan indiferentes ante el error. El jurado comprendi\u00f3 el dolor de la v\u00edctima y le concedi\u00f3 una indemnizaci\u00f3n por da\u00f1os y perjuicios en el caso. Sin embargo, tambi\u00e9n determin\u00f3 que era 30% responsable debido a la falta de comunicaci\u00f3n. El hombre no hablaba ingl\u00e9s, por lo que se cree que el m\u00e9dico malinterpret\u00f3 que quer\u00eda una circuncisi\u00f3n y no una vasectom\u00eda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">El error no se descubri\u00f3 hasta que el hombre volvi\u00f3 para un seguimiento despu\u00e9s de la operaci\u00f3n. Fue entonces cuando decidi\u00f3 presentar la&nbsp;<a href=\"\/es\/medical-malpractice\/\">demanda por negligencia m\u00e9dica<\/a>&nbsp;contra el m\u00e9dico y la propia cl\u00ednica. Tambi\u00e9n se demand\u00f3 a un servicio de interpretaci\u00f3n que utiliz\u00f3, pero no se le declar\u00f3 responsable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La v\u00edctima recibi\u00f3 $1,4 millones por da\u00f1os y perjuicios y la cl\u00ednica present\u00f3 un recurso. El recurso fue denegado posteriormente. El abogado del hombre explic\u00f3 que, como no habla ingl\u00e9s, cuatro int\u00e9rpretes tradujeron todo lo que aparec\u00eda en los documentos escritos de consentimiento informado de la cl\u00ednica. Dijo que la cl\u00ednica culpaba a su cliente de haberse sometido a la vasectom\u00eda y de no haber impedido que se realizara el procedimiento.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nadie acude a un centro m\u00e9dico de Nueva Jersey esperando que le practiquen una intervenci\u00f3n y al final le practiquen otra. Eso mismo le ocurri\u00f3 a un hombre que iba a someterse a una circuncisi\u00f3n, pero en su lugar recibi\u00f3 una vasectom\u00eda. \u00bfQu\u00e9 ocurri\u00f3? Un hombre de unos 40 a\u00f1os ten\u00eda programada una circuncisi\u00f3n en una cl\u00ednica de Iowa. Aunque es padre de tres hijos, ten\u00eda planes de tener m\u00e1s. Al final, eso ya no fue posible porque, en lugar del procedimiento que esperaba, m\u00e1s tarde se dio cuenta de que el m\u00e9dico le hab\u00eda practicado una vasectom\u00eda. La noticia fue devastadora para \u00e9l. El jurado concede al hombre una indemnizaci\u00f3n por negligencia m\u00e9dica La situaci\u00f3n llev\u00f3 al hombre a presentar una demanda por negligencia m\u00e9dica. El m\u00e9dico y el personal de la cl\u00ednica donde se realiz\u00f3 la intervenci\u00f3n parec\u00edan indiferentes ante el error. El jurado comprendi\u00f3 el dolor de la v\u00edctima y le concedi\u00f3 una indemnizaci\u00f3n por da\u00f1os y perjuicios. Sin embargo, tambi\u00e9n determin\u00f3 que era 30% responsable debido a la falta de comunicaci\u00f3n. El hombre no hablaba ingl\u00e9s, por lo que se cree que el m\u00e9dico malinterpret\u00f3 que quer\u00eda una circuncisi\u00f3n y no una vasectom\u00eda. El error no se descubri\u00f3 hasta que el hombre volvi\u00f3 para una revisi\u00f3n despu\u00e9s de la operaci\u00f3n. Fue entonces cuando decidi\u00f3 presentar la demanda por negligencia m\u00e9dica contra el m\u00e9dico y la propia cl\u00ednica. Un servicio de interpretaci\u00f3n que utiliz\u00f3 tambi\u00e9n acab\u00f3 siendo demandado, pero no fue declarado responsable. La v\u00edctima recibi\u00f3 $1,4 millones por da\u00f1os y perjuicios y la cl\u00ednica present\u00f3 un recurso. El recurso fue denegado posteriormente. El abogado del hombre explic\u00f3 que, como no habla ingl\u00e9s, cuatro int\u00e9rpretes tradujeron todo lo que aparec\u00eda en los documentos escritos de consentimiento informado de la cl\u00ednica. Dijo que la cl\u00ednica culpaba a su cliente de haberse sometido a la vasectom\u00eda y de no haber impedido que se realizara el procedimiento.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_ai_research_index":"1","footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-598","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-medical-malpractice"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Jury Finds Medical Malpractice on Patient Who Got Vasectomy | Glugeth &amp; Pierguidi, P.C.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A man who was set to undergo a circumcision, but due to negligence, received a vasectomy instead. The victim received $1.4 million in damages.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/es\/blog\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_MX\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jury Finds Medical Malpractice on Patient Who Got Vasectomy | Glugeth &amp; Pierguidi, P.C.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A man who was set to undergo a circumcision, but due to negligence, received a vasectomy instead. The victim received $1.4 million in damages.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/es\/blog\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Glugeth &amp; Pierguidi, P.C.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-07-07T01:56:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-03-06T22:36:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"jdxbasedev\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@reporting@jurisdigital.com\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"jdxbasedev\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/blog\\\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/blog\\\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"jdxbasedev\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/24720536103477697e37a1b38f063627\"},\"headline\":\"Jury Finds Medical Malpractice on Patient Who Got Vasectomy\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-07-07T01:56:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-03-06T22:36:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/blog\\\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":310,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Medical Malpractice\"],\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/blog\\\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/blog\\\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/blog\\\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\\\/\",\"name\":\"Jury Finds Medical Malpractice on Patient Who Got Vasectomy | Glugeth &amp; Pierguidi, P.C.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-07-07T01:56:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-03-06T22:36:41+00:00\",\"description\":\"A man who was set to undergo a circumcision, but due to negligence, received a vasectomy instead. The victim received $1.4 million in damages.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/blog\\\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/blog\\\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/blog\\\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jury Finds Medical Malpractice on Patient Who Got Vasectomy\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Glugeth & Pierguidi, P.C.\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Glugeth & Pierguidi, P.C.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/njnylawyers.wpengine.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/11\\\/img_header_logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/njnylawyers.wpengine.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/11\\\/img_header_logo.png\",\"width\":426,\"height\":107,\"caption\":\"Glugeth & Pierguidi, P.C.\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.njnylawyers.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/24720536103477697e37a1b38f063627\",\"name\":\"jdxbasedev\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/78ca6fbe5602f84fb07bfa79dd9c1210008e501743afcbb5b0c624d07743e6e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/78ca6fbe5602f84fb07bfa79dd9c1210008e501743afcbb5b0c624d07743e6e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/78ca6fbe5602f84fb07bfa79dd9c1210008e501743afcbb5b0c624d07743e6e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"jdxbasedev\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/njnylawyers.wpengine.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/reporting@jurisdigital.com\",\"jdxbasedev\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Un jurado dictamina que hubo negligencia m\u00e9dica en el caso de un paciente al que se le practic\u00f3 una vasectom\u00eda | Glugeth &amp; Pierguidi, P.C.","description":"Un hombre que iba a someterse a una circuncisi\u00f3n, pero que, debido a una negligencia, recibi\u00f3 en su lugar una vasectom\u00eda. La v\u00edctima recibi\u00f3 una indemnizaci\u00f3n de 1 400 000 pesos.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/es\/blog\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\/","og_locale":"es_MX","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jury Finds Medical Malpractice on Patient Who Got Vasectomy | Glugeth &amp; Pierguidi, P.C.","og_description":"A man who was set to undergo a circumcision, but due to negligence, received a vasectomy instead. The victim received $1.4 million in damages.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/es\/blog\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\/","og_site_name":"Glugeth &amp; Pierguidi, P.C.","article_published_time":"2022-07-07T01:56:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-03-06T22:36:41+00:00","author":"jdxbasedev","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@reporting@jurisdigital.com","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"jdxbasedev","Est. reading time":"2 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/blog\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/blog\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\/"},"author":{"name":"jdxbasedev","@id":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/#\/schema\/person\/24720536103477697e37a1b38f063627"},"headline":"Jury Finds Medical Malpractice on Patient Who Got Vasectomy","datePublished":"2022-07-07T01:56:00+00:00","dateModified":"2023-03-06T22:36:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/blog\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\/"},"wordCount":310,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Medical Malpractice"],"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/blog\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/blog\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\/","url":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/blog\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\/","name":"Un jurado dictamina que hubo negligencia m\u00e9dica en el caso de un paciente al que se le practic\u00f3 una vasectom\u00eda | Glugeth &amp; Pierguidi, P.C.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-07-07T01:56:00+00:00","dateModified":"2023-03-06T22:36:41+00:00","description":"Un hombre que iba a someterse a una circuncisi\u00f3n, pero que, debido a una negligencia, recibi\u00f3 en su lugar una vasectom\u00eda. La v\u00edctima recibi\u00f3 una indemnizaci\u00f3n de 1 400 000 pesos.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/blog\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/blog\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/blog\/jury-finds-medical-malpractice-on-patient-who-got-vasectomy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jury Finds Medical Malpractice on Patient Who Got Vasectomy"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/","name":"Glugeth &amp; Pierguidi, P.C.","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/#organization","name":"Glugeth &amp; Pierguidi, P.C.","url":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/njnylawyers.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/img_header_logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/njnylawyers.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/img_header_logo.png","width":426,"height":107,"caption":"Glugeth & Pierguidi, P.C."},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/#\/schema\/person\/24720536103477697e37a1b38f063627","name":"jdxbasedev","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/78ca6fbe5602f84fb07bfa79dd9c1210008e501743afcbb5b0c624d07743e6e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/78ca6fbe5602f84fb07bfa79dd9c1210008e501743afcbb5b0c624d07743e6e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/78ca6fbe5602f84fb07bfa79dd9c1210008e501743afcbb5b0c624d07743e6e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"jdxbasedev"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/njnylawyers.wpengine.com","https:\/\/x.com\/reporting@jurisdigital.com","jdxbasedev"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/598","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=598"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/598\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.njnylawyers.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}